Negotiating Boundaries Between Gender and Social Identities in the Principality of Samos: The Case of Divorces (1902–1911)

Authors

  • Vasilios Gialamas Faculty of Early Childhood Education, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Sofia Iliadou-Tachou Faculty of Primary Education, University of Western Macedonia, Florina, Greece
  • Alexia Orfanou Faculty of Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v8i1.p90-103

Keywords:

Marriage, Divorce, Gender, Social Identity, Principality of Samos

Abstract

This study focuses on divorces in the Principality of Samos, which existed from 1834 to 1912. The process of divorce is described according to the laws of the rincipality, and divorces are examined among those published in the Newspaper of the Government of the Principality of Samos from the last decade of the Principality from 1902 to 1911. Issues linked to divorce are investigated, like the differences between husbands and wives regarding the initiation and reasons for requesting a divorce. These differences are integrated in the specific social context of the Principality, and the qualitative characteristics are determined in regard to the gender ratio of women and men that is articulated by the invocation of divorce. The aim is to determine the boundaries of social identities of gender with focus on the prevailing perceptions of the social roles of men and women. Gender is used as a social and cultural construction. It is argued that the social gender identity is formed through a process of “performativity”, that is, through adaptation to the dominant social ideals.

References

Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias. (2015). Divorce. [Online] Available: http://greek_greek.enacademic.com (November 15, 2015).

Argyriadis, A. (1978). Reform of Family Law in Greece. In A. G. Chloros (Ed.), The Reform of Family Law in Europe (pp. 139-149). Dordrecht: Spinger-Science+Business Media, B.V.

Bell, J. (1993). Doing your research project, A guide for first-time researchers in education and social science. (2nd ed.). Buckingham-Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Free Press.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.

Cohen, L, & Manion, L. (1996). Research Methods in Education (4th ed.). London-New York: Routledge.

Evans, M. (2003). Gender and Social Theory, Theorizing Society. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Fragoulis, E. (1899). Civil Code of the Principality of Samos with Explanatory Report. Samos: Printing Office of the Principality of Samos.

General State Archives of Greece, Regional Archives of Samos. Law ????About civil-status records, Laws ? - ?, Years 1851-1858.

General State Archives of Greece, Regional Archives of Samos. Laws of the Principality of Samos (1859-1908).

General State Archives of Greece, Regional Archives of Samos. Proceedings of ?? General Assembly of Samians, 1839, April 11.

Iliadou-Tachou, S. and Orfanou, A. (2014). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(22), 515-521.

Kyriazi, N. (2011). The Sociological Research, Critical Overview of Methods and Techniques. Athens: Pedio.

Laiou, S. (2007). Christian women in an Ottoman World: Interpersonal and family cases brought before the Shari?a Courts During the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Cases Involving the Greek Community). In A. Buturovi?, & I. Cemil (Eds.), Women in the Ottoman Balkans, Gender, Culture and History (pp. 243-272). London: I. B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

Lord, A. (2005). Age, race, class, and sex: Women redefining difference. In M. Zinn, P. Hondagneu-Sotelo, & M. Messner (Eds.), Gender through the prism of difference (3rd ed., pp. 245-250). New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maruani, M. (2005). Femmes, genre et sociétés. Paris: La Découverte.

Moore, H. (2006). The future of gender or the end of a brilliant career? In P. L. Geller, & M. K. Stockett (Eds.), Feminist Anthropology. Past, Present and Future (pp. 23-42).Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Newspaper of the Government of the Principality of Samos, 1902-1911.Samos: Official Princely Printing.

Orfanou, A. (2012). The Institutional Framework and the Ideological Function of Education in the Greek Island of Samos in the Period of Principality (August 1834 - March 1913) (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Florina: University of Western Macedonia.

Papadakis, B. (2008). The Orthodox theology on divorce. Rethymno: Monastery of St. Anastasia the Roman.

Phillips, R. (1991). Untying the Knot: A Short History of Divorce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Riessman, C. K. (1990). Divorce talk: Women and men make sense of personal relationships. Piscataway, NJ, US: Rutgers University Press.

Rosaldo, ?., & Lamphere, L. (1974) (Eds.), Women culture and society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Seymour, M. (2006). Debating Divorce in Italy: Marriage and the making of modern Italians,1860-1974. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Stone, L. (1990). Road to divorce: England, 1530-1987. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stone, L. (1993). Broken lives: separation and divorce in England 1660-1857. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Svoronos, G. (1903). Samian legislation: containing the privileges of the hegemony of Samos and all existing laws. Samos: Official Princely Printing.

Svoronos, G. (1907). Samian Civil Code on the capitulations and Greek-Turkish Consular Convention. Samos: Official Princely Printing.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-29

How to Cite

Negotiating Boundaries Between Gender and Social Identities in the Principality of Samos: The Case of Divorces (1902–1911). (2017). European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 4(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v8i1.p90-103