Preclusion of the Right to Submit New Facts and Evidence According to the Law on Contested Procedure in Kosovo
AbstractThe market economy and changes within Republic of Kosovo’s legal system, which imposed the need of legal changes within the field of contested procedure also, have caused this procedure to become more efficient vis-à-vis legal provisions which were in force until October 6th 2008. Through the Law on Contested Procedure (hereinafter “LCP”), the legislator has aimed, inter alia, to make the contested procedure more concentrated, and thus, more efficient. In this regard, the Kosovar legislator has determined that it is mandatory for the parties to present any and all relevant evidence for resolving the dispute until the preparatory session, and in the event that one was not held, until the first main hearing session. As an exception, the parties may present relevant evidence even after this stage of proceedings, provided that their failure to present said evidence no later than at the preparatory session, respectively first main hearing session, was through no fault of their own. I consider that these legislative amendments are vital to ensuring practical implementation of the principle of efficience in the contested procedure.
May 19, 2017
How to Cite
QERKINI, ARTAN. Preclusion of the Right to Submit New Facts and Evidence According to the Law on Contested Procedure in Kosovo. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 3, p. 84-88, may 2017. ISSN 2312-8429. Available at: <http://journals.euser.org/index.php/ejser/article/view/1952>. Date accessed: 16 july 2019. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v10i1.p84-88.
CC Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY4.0)