School Principals’ Opinions About Level of their Entrepreneurship

The aim of the research is to find out that how they evaluate level of entrepreneurship and what sort of individual and environmental problems during they improve their sufficiency of entrepreneurship. The qualitative research’s study group is composed of 20 principals in center of Kocaeli in 2014-2015 years. Inverse sampling technical is used. The data is collected semi-structured interview. The data is analyzed by descriptive analysis. One of the results is that the most of school principals who have got high level of entrepreneurship (f=7) utter their entrepreneurship’s level link to such as diversity, innovation, activity and performance. Half of the school principals who have got low level of entrepreneurship utter their level link to lag behind with developing world. Principals who have high level of entrepreneurship (f=5) have problems about over responsibilities of individual life during improving their sufficiency of entrepreneurship. As well as, the principals have problems such as lack of communication and motivation. In view of environmental conditions, all of participants have problems about improving their sufficiency of entrepreneurship such as work ethic and value conflict and different beliefs, bureaucracy and resource copetition. In parallel with the results, there are various suggestions.


Introduction
The education staffs have two power as interior and exterior power to start a work and carry out the work.The means of interior power is that comprise of physical and environmental factors and the means of interior power is that comprise of spiritual and persons' belief about self-reliance and self-efficacy.It is a expected case that teachers and principals have powers both interior and exterior power.But it may not be possible that these powers don't merge because of differences in workplace environment, relationships or their personal life.If exterior powers are more than interior power, the quality of education may be affected negatively.If interior powers are more than exterior power and interior power ensure the exterior powers' refreshment, the quality of education may be a better level than the before.Based on this, entrepreneurship can be qualified as one of interior powers that have importance.Entrepreneurs who see opportunities that others can't see and go into production the idea and they are to provide added value for society (Yıldırım, 2013:25).
Entrepreneurship take an active role in democracy, economic development and personal welfare (Top, 2012:36).Schools are important to bring up entrepreneurship students and this is a necessity in changing education needs.The method of acquisition of entrepreneurship behaviors may be acquisition of entrepreneurship for students as well as it may be displaying role model in schools.In the study the hypothesis is that principals display role model regarding this issue and for Aydın ( 2010) principals must prove that continuous and constructive change are terminal quality.Existence of school principals who show entrepreneurial behaviours and learning leadership and put into production innovation and creative ideas that may become positive effects.For school principals' entrepreneur behaviors are that achieving the schools 'aims, working through differential for their schools and be self-denying to advance organizational climate and culture.It depends on school principals who management is not only use force and authority but also working hard and taking responsibility to form as learning, independent, creative and innovator schools (Özden, 1998:9).To find out how school principals evaluate level of entrepreneurship and what sort of individual and environmental problems during they improve their sufficiency of entrepreneurship may give clues to form as learning, independent, creative and innovator schools.In this context, the aim of the research is to find out that how they evaluate level of entrepreneurship and what sort of individual and environmental problems during they improve their sufficiency of entrepreneurship.

Method
The study is a qualitative research and used phenomenological model.The data is collected semi-structured interview form that contains three questions.The obtained data is analyzed by descriptive analysis.The study group is composed of 20 principals who works at different schools that located in center of Kocaeli in 2014-2015 academic years.Purposive sampling method and inverse sampling technical is used.One of the inverse sampling is contains 10 principals who have low sufficiency of entrepreneurship and the other group is 10 principals who have high sufficiency of entrepreneurship.There is the study groups' demographic information on Table 1.

Findings
In the part, there are findings how they evaluate level of entrepreneurship and what sort of individual and environmental problems during they improve their sufficiency of entrepreneurship.It is received the schools 'principal opinions to find out their perception level related to that question 'what do you think about your entrepreneurship level?' .
The high level of entrepreneur principals' opinions are as below: I am aware that all of varied and alternative field develops persons.I think that I am a entrepreneur every field as far as I can (H1,H7).
Since I follow the new improvement, varied and efficient fields ensure march.Therefore, entrepreneurship is important.I am aware of entrepreneur myself since sense of wonder turn into behaviors to break out of the routine (H2).
I think that I am too entrepreneur.Because when I start action, I don't think whether it will be or not.I believe that action will ok (H3).
I am entrepreneur.I have play active role in my career.I must open new ideas.In my opinion, the entrepreneurship means that to manage all of works and to conduct the school.(H4,H6).
I believe that I am entrepreneur but ı know that entrepreneurship is limitless.(H5,H9).
My performance and personal characteristic make me think as a entrepreneur.(H8).
When I evaluate process of initialization and implementation of activities, I think that I am entrepreneur but ıt is my perception.Maybe, the things may be ordinary according to others.( H10).
The low level of entrepreneur principals opinions are as below: I am not sufficient for any issue.But I believe that I am not entrepreneur.I think ı must improve my entrepreneurship efficacy.(L1,L6).
I believe that I will be entrepreneur in my interest and talent field.But I think about the feature of affecting entrepreneurship is accumulation of knowledge.I am satisfied that I am not entrepreneur fairly (L2).
When I see recent developments and knowledge about entrepreneurship, I feel that I am not sufficient but I open new ideas (L3, L8).
By now, I was satisfied that I was entrepreneur for attempt to enhance economic and education opportunity as far as interests, aptitudes and talents.And in globalizing world, on one hand, change and development are continuous, on the other hand you can't stand the pace.So you feel that you are insufficient, very much (L4,L9).
I think I am not so entrepreneur because of drudge (L5,L7,L10).
It was asked that question 'what sort of personal problems to improve your entrepreneurship efficacy?' to find out the school principals' opinion about this issue.These are as below.
The responsibility of a mother may hinder entrepreneurship (H1).
The problem is to not keep up with the technology (H3).
Monotony may originate unwillingness but sometimes you want to do everything to get rid of the monotony.It must be habit.As well as, quality of the private life (H6).
I want to do a lot of work so that it prevents my works' qualities and things to do (H9).
A motivational and feeling with your back against the well ( L1).
Lack of energy to do something in the life, married life, too much responsibilities, limited time (L2,L9).
The school management activities weaken me and it prevents to afford for entrepreneurship.Indeed, key entrepreneurship is to want and believe (L3,L7).
The problem about effective communication and the style of growing up restricted us.If we want or not, this circumstance prevents entrepreneurship (L4).